Diskresi Penyidik dalam Laporan Nomor LP/B/235/IX/2023/ SPKT III pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Hutang-Piutang di Wilayah Polda Banten
Keywords:
accounts payble, credit, disputeAbstract
Debt and credit are agreements between two parties, which generally discuss movable and immovable assets that have a monetary value. This object often becomes a dispute between legal subjects so that it often ends in criminal law as the ultimum remidium. The aim of this research is to determine the Investigator's Discretion in Report No: LP/B/235/IX/2023/ SPKT III on the Settlement of Debt-Receivable Disputes in the Banten Regional Police Area. This research uses a normative juridical method, namely research conducted based on primary legal materials by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and statutory regulations related to this research, with the help of secondary data and analyzed descriptively. This research shows that the discretion of police investigators in the criminal justice system creates a complex relationship between law, discretion, police, investigations and the criminal justice system. The police need to be careful in handling criminal cases, because the criminal elements emphasize guilt, especially the social conditions. The public is still little aware that good faith in criminal cases is very important for the defense of the accused
References
Akmal, D. U. (2023). Indonesian State of Law: The Essence of Human Rights Protection in the Establishment of Laws and Regulation. Primagraha Law Review, 1(1), 1–11.
Anindita, L., & Sitanggang, F. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bedrog (Penipuan) Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Kayu: Onrechtmatige Daad Atau Wederrechtelijk? (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR: 449K/PID/2001). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52, 301–219.
Astari, P. (2015). Landasan Filosofis Tindakan Diskresi Kepolisian Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Arena Hukum, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00801.1
Firmansyah, A., Widodo, H., & Mamang, D. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Implementasi Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Veritas, 8(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i2.2066
Hamdani, F., Putra, E. A. M., Akbar, D. A., Pangastuti, D. P., & Anam, F. K. (2023). Fiksi Hukum: Idealita, Realita, dan Problematikanya di Masyarakat. Primagraha Law Review, 1(2), 71–83.
Heriyanto, B. (2022). Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menggunakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Diskursus Diskresi Kepolisian. Transparansi Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v5i2.3055
Hosnah, A. U., Wijanarko, D. S., & Sibuea, H. P. (2021). Karakteristik lmu Hukum dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (D. Safitri, Ed.; 1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Pub. L. No. 1 (1946).
Muhammad, A. K. (2004). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Musadad, A. (2020). Konsep Hutang-Piutang Dalam Al-Qur’an. Dinar : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21107/dinar.v6i1.6600
Romdoni, M. (2023). A critique and solution of justice, certainty, and usefulness in law enforcement in Indonesia. Journal Of Law Science, 5(4), 174–181.
Santoso, P. (2020). Diskresi Kepolisian melalui Mediasi Penal (Studi Kasus di Polsek Galur, Kulonprogo). Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1206
Siregar, S. A., & Manalu, K. A. (2020). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dengan Dasar Hutang Piutang. Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v3i1.815
Soeroso, R. (2003). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata (1st ed., Vol. 5). Sinar Grafika.
Tiodor, C., & M, T. (2023). Pembuktian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Secara Lisan. Jurnal Krisna Law, 5(1), 1–27.
